|
Short Tandem
Repeats: Dinucleotide
repeat polymorphisms (1), and trinucleotide and tetranucleotide
repeats (2-6), are called Short Tandem Repeats (STRs). The
tandemly repeated consensus sequences are only two to four
bases long. The shorter repeat lengths of STR markers
make them more compatible with use of the polymerase
chain reaction (PCR). This advantage has made
them popular and useful markers for recent genetic maps
(7-8).
Desirable features for STR systems include
The application of STR markers
to the forensic sciences and paternity analyses requires
only a limited number of markers from the thousands which
have been generated for genetic mapping purposes. However,
the selected markers must have several characteristics to
be useful for human identification. First, only STRs
which demonstrate a high degree of variability within the
population should be selected. Second, the amplified
products must be easily distinguished from one another. This
means rejecting markers which contain frequent microvariants
(i.e., alleles differing from one another by lengths shorter
than the repeat length) as the closer and more random spacing
of alleles is more difficult to interpret. Finally,
the prevalence of stutter bands [i.e., amplification artifacts
which appear one or more repeat lengths above or below the
true amplified allele (1,9-10)], has led to the rejection
of dinucleotide repeats as a class for these applications.
For forensic applications, the ability to amplify
and detect very small amounts of DNA template (typically
1 ng) is essential. For paternity analyses, the mutation
rate of the markers must be extremely low to avoid false
exclusion of suspected fathers. In all cases, the reliability
and reproducibility of the data is of utmost importance. In
a mapping project, a mistake may mean that a computer program
will identify an unlikely double-recombinant which can be
reviewed and corrected. However, the life of one or
more individuals will be altered by the outcome of forensic
or paternity analyses.
Identification of the best markers for these
applications is complicated by the fact that their desired
traits are not fully compatible with one another. While
it is possible to identify highly polymorphic markers with
a relatively low presence of stutter bands (11-12), such
markers generally display microvariants and increased mutation
frequency (13-14).
STRs are similar to VNTRs and the general principles
for using them are the same. They differ from VNTRs in having
smaller repeat units, from 2 to 7 bases, and the total size
of a STR is smaller, usually less than 500 bases. The
smaller size means that the PCR can be used to amplify very
small amounts, less than 1 ng, of DNA. It also permits analysis
of degraded DNA, that is DNA that is broken into short pieces.
Such degraded DNA often cannot be analyzed by Southern blot
analysis of VNTRs, which requires higher quality DNA (e.g.,
larger fragments). The use of the PCR permits a very
tiny amount of DNA, such as would be found on a postage stamp,
cigarette butt, or coffee cup, to be amplified to produce
an amount large enough to be analyzed (See our forensic cases
section). The PCR also consumes less sample, preserving
more material for repeat or referee analysis
The amplified products are separated by electrophoresis
as described for the VNTR fragments. But, whereas for
VNTRs all the DNA in the cells is on the gel, with STRs only
the region of interest is amplified. However, the smaller
range of fragment sizes of STRs and the use of more discriminating
separation systems allow identification of all alleles at
a locus. Thus, the requirement for bins is eliminated.
|
 |
|
One allele has an eight
repeat the other allele has a seven repeat. |
|
|
There are, however, micro-variants
(i.e., alleles that differ from other alleles by less than
one repeat length) which increase discriminating power of
the system, but can create problems of band resolution. In forensic applications,
amplified and separated STR fragments are generally detected
using one of two methods. One method uses the propensity
of silver to bind to DNA. The entire gel is stained with
silver, but because of the greater amount of DNA in amplified
fragments, they stand out against the more dilute background. A
second, increasingly prevalent method requires that some of the
primers used during the amplification contain fluorescent tags
which are incorporated into the STR fragments generated during
amplification. Following fragment separation by electrophoresis,
an instrument is used to detect the position of separated fluorescent
products. Increasingly, laboratories are using real-time detection
during electrophoresis. As in the case of the VNTR systems, the
sizes (i.e., number of DNA bases) of the STR fragments detected
are used to characterize the sample DNA. The allele designation
for each locus is generally the number of times a repeated unit
is present within the identified fragments. STR loci that
have been selected for forensic uses generally have 7 to 30 different
alleles. The population heterozygosity is about 80 percent
compared to 90 percent or more for VNTRs. This relatively
small number of alleles compared to the VNTR loci usually leads
to unambiguous results, but limits the amount of statistical
information and significance that can be obtained from an individual
locus. STR loci are very numerous in the genome and many
appropriate loci have already been identified. Fortunately,
it is possible to analyze a DNA sample at many STR loci simultaneously. Such
systems (multiplexes) have been developed that allow amplification
of 3 to 16 loci at once. Many forensic laboratories now
have instruments that distinguish different fluorescent dyes
used to tag particular loci. These advances have allowed
the development of multiplex systems that maintain small amplification
product sizes, and therefore can use existing separation methods.
Advantages of STR systems: We
selected STR systems for development as genetic markers for forensic
science, paternity analysis and tissue culture verification because
they offer several advantages over previously employed methods.
STR markers are plentiful -- more than two thousand STRs suitable
for genetic mapping studies have been described (7-8). From these,
we have selected those STRs which have high discrimination potential
yet minimal genetic artifacts (such as microvariants) and minimal
amplification artifacts (such as stutter bands).
Tandemly repeated DNA sequences are widespread
throughout the human genome and show sufficient variability among
individuals in a population that they have become important in
several fields including genetic mapping, linkage analysis, and
human identity testing. These tandemly repeated regions
of DNA are typically classified into several groups depending
on the size of the repeat region. Minisatellites (variable
number of tandem repeats, VNTRs) have core repeats with 9-80
bp, while microsatellites (short tandem repeats, STRs) contain
2-5 bp repeats. The forensic DNA community has moved primarily
towards tetranucleotide repeats, which may be amplified using
the PCR with
greater fidelity than dinucleotide repeats. The variety
of alleles present in a population is such that a high degree
of discrimination among individuals in the population may be
obtained when multiple STR loci are examined.
Advantages of STRs over
traditional RFLP techniques: PCR-based
STRs have several advantages over conventional Southern blotting
techniques of the larger variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs).
Discrete alleles from STR systems may be obtained due to
their smaller size, which puts them in the size range where
DNA fragments differing by a single basepair in size may
be differentiated. Determination of discrete alleles
allows results to be compared easily between laboratories
without binning. In addition, smaller quantities of DNA,
including degraded DNA, may be typed using STRs. Thus,
the quantity and integrity of the DNA sample is less of an
issue with PCR-based typing methods than with conventional
RFLP methods.
The advantages of STRs are:
1. The process can be used with degraded samples
(since shorter fragments of DNA can be analyzed).
2. The PCR process
permits analysis of extremely small amounts of DNA.
3. The potential number of loci is very large.
This is particularly important if siblings or other relatives
are involved.
4. The process is rapid; it may be completed in
a day or two.
5. The system lends itself to multiplexing and
automation.
STR loci
commonly used in DNA typing: There
are literally hundreds of STR systems which have been mapped
throughout the human genome. Several dozen have been
investigated for application to human identity testing (17-19). These
STR loci are found on almost every chromosome in the genome. They
may be amplified using a variety of PCR primers. Tetranucleotide
repeats have been most popular among forensic scientists
due to their fidelity in PCR amplification although some
tri- and pentanucleotide repeats are also in use (15-19).
References: 1.
Weber J.L. and May, P.E. (1989) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 44, 388; 2.
Edwards, A. et al. (1991) In: The Second International Symposium
on Human Identification, Promega Corporation, 31; 3. Edwards,
A. et al. (1991) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49, 746; 4. Polymeropoulos,
M.H. et al. (1991) Nucl. Acids Res. 19, 4018; 5. Polymeropoulos,
M.H. et al. (1991) Nucl. Acids Res. 19, 4306; 6. Polymeropoulos,
M.H. et al. (1991) Nucl. Acids Res. 19, 3753; 7. Murray, J.C.
et al. (1994) Science 265, 2049; 8. Adamson, D. et al. (1995)
Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 619; 9. Levinson, G. and Gutman, G.A.
(1987) Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 203; 10. Schlotterer, C. and Tautz,
D. (1992) Nucl. Acids Res. 20, 211; 11. Sprecher, C.J. et al.
(1996) BioTechniques 20, 266; 12. Lins, A.M. et al. (1996) BioTechniques
20, 882; 13. Moller, A., Meyer, E. and Brinkmann, B. (1994) Int.
J. Leg. Med. 106, 319; 14. Brinkmann, B., Moller, A. and Wiegand,
P. (1995) Int. J. Leg. Med. 107, 201. 15. Wyman, A.R. and White,
R. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 6754; 16. Jeffreys,
A.J., Wilson, V. and Thein, S.L. (1985) Nature 316, 76; 17. Donis-Keller,
H. et al. (1987) Cell 51, 319; 18. Schumm, J.W. et al. (1988)
Am. J. Hum. Genet. 42, 143; 19. Nakamura, Y. et al. (1987) Science
235, 1616.
|